From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poincy v. White Bus Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 15, 2000.

December 27, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants White Bus Company, Inc., and Donald L. Brower appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated February 10, 2000, which denied their motion to vacate their default in opposing the plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike their answer.

Fishman, Dorfman Callahan, Pearl River, N.Y. (John J. Komar of counsel), for appellants.

Mark R. Bower, P.C., New York, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, and the answer is reinstated.

It is well settled that a defendant attempting to vacate a default must establish a reasonable excuse for the default, a meritorious defense, and a lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party (see, Morgese v. Laro Maintenance Corp., 251 A.D.2d 307; Albin v. First Nationwide Network Mtge. Co., 188 A.D.2d 575). A court may, in its discretion, accept a claim of law office failure as satisfying the reasonable excuse requirement (see, CPLR 2005; cf., Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). Here, the defendants' claim of law office failure was sufficient to establish reasonable excuse. Furthermore, the defendants demonstrated a meritorious defense, and, since the evidence sought by the plaintiffs' discovery was not significant to the central issues to be litigated, there was no evidence of prejudice to the plaintiffs. Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants' motion.


Summaries of

Poincy v. White Bus Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Poincy v. White Bus Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HUBERMAN POINCY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. WHITE BUS COMPANY, INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

Juarbe v. City of New York

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. To vacate a default, a movant must establish both a…

Jackson-Cutler v. Long

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A party seeking to vacate its default…