Summary
denying motion to amend where allegations were legal conclusions that failed to state any claim for relief
Summary of this case from Frost v. Suffolk Constr. Co.Opinion
Civil No. 11cv102-JL
11-03-2014
Steve Podkulski v. Doe et al
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated October 8, 2014. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
/s/_________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: November 3, 2014 cc: Steve Podkulski, pro se
John A. Curran, Esq.