From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plunkett v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Sep 22, 2008
CASE NO. 5:08CV00102 SWW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 22, 2008)

Summary

acknowledging that a Rule 37 petitioner bears the burden of obtaining a ruling and perfecting his appeal under Arkansas law

Summary of this case from May v. Payne

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:08CV00102 SWW.

September 22, 2008


ORDER


The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. After careful review of those Findings and Recommendations, the timely objections received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Plunkett v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Sep 22, 2008
CASE NO. 5:08CV00102 SWW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 22, 2008)

acknowledging that a Rule 37 petitioner bears the burden of obtaining a ruling and perfecting his appeal under Arkansas law

Summary of this case from May v. Payne
Case details for

Plunkett v. Norris

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL PLUNKETT PETITIONER v. LARRY NORRIS, Director of the Arkansas…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Sep 22, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 5:08CV00102 SWW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

May v. Payne

to avail himself of the remedies that were still available to him to preserve his right to appeal to the…