From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plotnicki v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 2003
301 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93

January 30, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered June 4, 2002, which upon the prior grant of defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

David Rosenberg, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Howard B. Sirota, for Defendants-Respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez, JJ.


The action for rescission of the parties' stipulation of settlement was properly dismissed since the motion court correctly found that the alleged conduct by defendants upon which plaintiff's claim for rescission was premised was permitted under the settlement agreement.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Plotnicki v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 2003
301 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Plotnicki v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN PLOTNICKI, ETC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURT GOLDSTEIN, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 30, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 371

Citing Cases

Olden Grp. v. 2890 Review Equity, LLC

Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying those branches of the plaintiff's…