From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pliss v. Erie Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1924
144 N.E. 906 (N.Y. 1924)

Opinion

Argued May 16, 1924

Decided June 3, 1924

Hamilton Ward and Dana L. Spring for appellant.

John S.N. Sprague for respondent.


Order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that the question of plaintiff's contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Pliss v. Erie Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1924
144 N.E. 906 (N.Y. 1924)
Case details for

Pliss v. Erie Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PLISS, Appellant, v . ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 3, 1924

Citations

144 N.E. 906 (N.Y. 1924)
144 N.E. 906

Citing Cases

Hochman v. Aronowitz

Hill, P.J., Rhodes and Heffernan, JJ., concur in reversing the judgments in favor of the defendants Aronowitz…