From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Platshorn v. United States Parole Commission

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Dec 28, 2005
Case No. 5:05cv185/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 5:05cv185/MCR/EMT.

December 28, 2005


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated September 26, 2005. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The complaint (Doc. 1), construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a).

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Platshorn v. United States Parole Commission

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Dec 28, 2005
Case No. 5:05cv185/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2005)
Case details for

Platshorn v. United States Parole Commission

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PLATSHORN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Dec 28, 2005

Citations

Case No. 5:05cv185/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2005)

Citing Cases

People v. Scott T.

Thus, reference to State law is only necessary to identify the type of unlawful activity in which the…

People v. Ortiz

Second, and perhaps more importantly, the legislative history of the RICO statute explicitly provides for the…