From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

P.J. Ritter Co. v. Bridgeton

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 13, 1948
59 A.2d 422 (N.J. 1948)

Summary

analogizing municipal-utility and private-utility ratemaking

Summary of this case from Meglino v. Township Committee of Eagleswood

Opinion

Argued February 5, 1948 —

Decided May 13, 1948.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 135 N.J.L. 22.

For the appellant, Stanger Howell ( Robert G. Howell, of counsel).

For the respondents, John A. Casarow ( David L. Hurovitz, of counsel).


The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, DONGES, EASTWOOD, WELLS, DILL, McLEAN, JJ. 6.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HEHER, BURLING, FREUND, SCHETTINO, JJ. 5.


Summaries of

P.J. Ritter Co. v. Bridgeton

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 13, 1948
59 A.2d 422 (N.J. 1948)

analogizing municipal-utility and private-utility ratemaking

Summary of this case from Meglino v. Township Committee of Eagleswood
Case details for

P.J. Ritter Co. v. Bridgeton

Case Details

Full title:P.J. RITTER CO., APPELLANT, v. THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BRIDGETON ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 13, 1948

Citations

59 A.2d 422 (N.J. 1948)
59 A.2d 422

Citing Cases

Snow v. Bell

Accordingly, plaintiffs are not entitled to an injunction since the petition filed with the borough was…

City of Sea Isle City v. Vinci

Ordinances to be valid and effectual must set forth with clarity some norm or standard by which all persons…