From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pizanie v. Citizens Investment Company

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston, Fourteenth District
Dec 31, 1969
448 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. Civ. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 327.

October 22, 1969. Rehearing Denied November 5, 1969. Writ of Error Outright Refused by Texas Supreme Court. December 31, 1969.

Appeal from the County Court, Galveston County, R. E. Magee, J.

Vincent J. Musachia, Houston, for appellants.

Kenneth C. Kaye, Hancock, Bellard Gay, Dickinson, for appellee.


Citizens Investment Company filed a forcible detainer suit in the Justice Court of Precinct #6 in Galveston County. The defendants in that suit were Harvey L. Pizanie and wife. The trial resulted in judgment for the defendants. Citizens Investment Company appealed to the County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County. The county court, pursuant to motion for summary judgment by Citizens Investment Company, rendered judgment for restitution for plaintiff but did not render judgment for any damages. The Pizanies have undertaken to appeal and Citizens Investment Company has moved to dismiss the appeal.

Article 3992, Vernon's Ann.Tex.Civ.St., provides that no appeal lies to the Court of Civil Appeals from a judgment of the county court in a forcible detainer suit unless the judgment awards damages in excess of $100. That statute controls the motion to dismiss. Keils v. Waldron, Tex.Civ.App., 240 S.W.2d 788, no writ hist.

The motion to dismiss this appeal is granted and the same is hereby dismissed.


Summaries of

Pizanie v. Citizens Investment Company

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston, Fourteenth District
Dec 31, 1969
448 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. Civ. App. 1969)
Case details for

Pizanie v. Citizens Investment Company

Case Details

Full title:Harvey L. PIZANIE et ux., Appellants, v. CITIZENS INVESTMENT COMPANY…

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston, Fourteenth District

Date published: Dec 31, 1969

Citations

448 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. Civ. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

Woolley v. Burger

The statute has, with one exception discussed below, consistently been construed to limit appeal beyond the…

Williamson v. Johnson

       We are confronted at the outset with appellee's contention that this court has no jurisdiction to…