From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pius v. Town of Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1998
250 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 11, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the claimant's constitutional and Federal statutory claims are barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel ( see, D'Arata v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire. Ins. Co., 76 N.Y.2d 659, 664; Kaufman v. Lilly Co., 65 N.Y.2d 449, 455; see also, Browning Ave. Realty Corp. v. Rubin, 207 A.D.2d 263; Zapata v. Town of Huntington, 193 A.D.2d 674; Matter of Manshul Constr. Corp. v. New York City School Constr. Auth., 192 A.D.2d 659; cf., American Home Assur. Co. v. International Ins. Co., 90 N.Y.2d 433; Lamontagne v. Board of Trustees, 183 A.D.2d 424).

Thompson, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pius v. Town of Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1998
250 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Pius v. Town of Huntington

Case Details

Full title:DONALD A. PIUS, Appellant, v. TOWN OF HUNTINGTON et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 771