From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pittsburgh v. Fraternal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 22, 2007
926 A.2d 437 (Pa. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 678 WAL 2006, 679 WAL 2006.

May 22, 2007.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nos. 678, 679 WAL 2006 from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 22nd day of May 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, as to the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court's decision permitting the reduction of post-retirement healthcare benefits for active officers conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Township, 514 Pa. 501, 526 A.2d 315 (1987)?

In briefing this issue, the parties are directed to address whether the arbitrator's award approving a capping of contributions for healthcare benefits for future retirees constitutes a diminishment in benefits in a present employee's pension or retirement system.


Summaries of

Pittsburgh v. Fraternal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 22, 2007
926 A.2d 437 (Pa. 2007)
Case details for

Pittsburgh v. Fraternal

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent, v. FRATERNAL ORDER of POLICE, Fort Pitt…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 22, 2007

Citations

926 A.2d 437 (Pa. 2007)
926 A.2d 437

Citing Cases

Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police

In our order, we specifically directed the parties "to address whether the arbitrator's award approving a…