From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 20, 1942
264 App. Div. 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

May 20, 1942.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and denial of the motion on the ground that the complaint read in the light of the affidavits presented on the motion may be construed as alleging a cause of action. ( Mnich v. American Radiator Company, 263 App. Div. 573.) (The judgment dismisses plaintiff's complaint on motion of the defendant in a silicosis action. The order is the order of dismissal.)


Summaries of

Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 20, 1942
264 App. Div. 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PITROWSKI, Appellant, v. HETZLER FOUNDRIES, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 20, 1942

Citations

264 App. Div. 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)