From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitcher v. Wackenhut Corp.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 12, 2007
3:05-CV-499 JCM (VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 12, 2007)

Summary

during 6-day transport from New York to Nevada, lack of air-conditioning in the inmate transport area with temperatures over 100 degrees and bathroom stops just once a day amounted to conditions sufficiently serious to meet the objective prong of the deliberate-indifference test

Summary of this case from Vensor v. Cent. Ariz. Corr. Facility

Opinion

3:05-CV-499 JCM (VPC).

September 12, 2007


ORDER


Presently before the court are the report and recommendations (#53) of United States Magistrate Judge Cooke, denying plaintiff's renewed motion for summary judgment (#44) and granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion for summary judgment (#45).

Local Rule IB 3-1 states that any party wishing to object to the ruling of the magistrate judge on a pretrial matter shall file a specific objection within ten (10) days from the date of service of the magistrate judge's ruling. No objections were filed.

Upon review of the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations (#53) and there being no objections filed,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Magistrate Judge Cooke's report and recommendations (#53) are AFFIRMED in their entirety.


Summaries of

Pitcher v. Wackenhut Corp.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 12, 2007
3:05-CV-499 JCM (VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 12, 2007)

during 6-day transport from New York to Nevada, lack of air-conditioning in the inmate transport area with temperatures over 100 degrees and bathroom stops just once a day amounted to conditions sufficiently serious to meet the objective prong of the deliberate-indifference test

Summary of this case from Vensor v. Cent. Ariz. Corr. Facility
Case details for

Pitcher v. Wackenhut Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HASTINGS PITCHER, Plaintiff, v. THE WACKENHUT CORP., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 12, 2007

Citations

3:05-CV-499 JCM (VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 12, 2007)

Citing Cases

Vensor v. Cent. Ariz. Corr. Facility

But every case the Court finds concerning exposure to extreme temperatures involves extended exposure, i.e.,…

Douglas v. Smelosky

Extreme heat conditions can be sufficiently serious to satisfy the objective requirement of an Eighth…