From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pisarik v. McCormack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1980
76 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

June 23, 1980


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated June 7, 1979, as denied his motion to dismiss the action pursuant to either section 253 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law or CPLR 3215 (subd [c]). Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiffs' failure to comply with the requirements of section 253 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was fatally defective to their action (see Lederman v. McLean Trucking Co., 41 A.D.2d 5; Howland v. Giorgetti, 12 A.D.2d 953; Metcalf v. Cowburn, 44 A.D.2d 650). Furthermore, in the absence of any acceptable excuse for the inordinate delay present, it was also an abuse of discretion to refuse to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3215 (subd [c]). Gulotta, J.P., Margett, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pisarik v. McCormack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1980
76 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Pisarik v. McCormack

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH PISARIK et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE A. McCORMACK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1980

Citations

76 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)