From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piro v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 25, 1968
53 N.J. 7 (N.J. 1968)

Opinion

Argued November 6, 1968 —

Decided November 25, 1968.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Geoffrey Gaulkin argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Beggans and Keale, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur N. D'Italia argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Warren, Chasan, Leyner Holland, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 456.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Piro v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 25, 1968
53 N.J. 7 (N.J. 1968)
Case details for

Piro v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

Case Details

Full title:SALVATORE PIRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 25, 1968

Citations

53 N.J. 7 (N.J. 1968)
247 A.2d 667

Citing Cases

Yong Sok Kim v. 1655 Valley Rd.

Ibid. See Piro v. Public Service Electric &Gas Co., 103 N.J.Super. 456 (App. Div. 1968), aff'd o.b. 53 N.J. 7…

Steward v. Esso Standard Oil Co.

As to him the owner is duty bound to exercise reasonable care to maintain the premises, where the work is to…