From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pirie v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Dec 27, 2019
286 So. 3d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-3123

12-27-2019

Matthew PIRIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew Pirie, Live Oak, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Daytona Beach, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew Pirie, Live Oak, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Daytona Beach, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Matthew Pirie appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Pirie argues that, following the vacation of one of his two convictions in this case, he was entitled to be resentenced under a corrected scoresheet. We agree. See Pierce v. State, 281 So. 3d 569, 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) and Termitus v State, 279 So. 3d 324, 326–27 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Accordingly, the summary denial of Pirie's 3.800(a) motion is reversed and this case is remanded for resentencing under a scoresheet that does not include Pirie's vacated conviction.

REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing under a recalculated scoresheet.

EDWARDS, HARRIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pirie v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Dec 27, 2019
286 So. 3d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Pirie v. State

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW PIRIE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 27, 2019

Citations

286 So. 3d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

Palmer v. State

The failure to hold de novo resentencing can be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion. Pirie v. State , 286 So. 3d…