From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piper v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Summary

In Ward v. Piper, 69 Kan. 773, 77 S.W. 699, it was held that where a judgment has been obtained on bonds or coupons which are payable out of a special fund that in seeking to enforce the judgment out of the special fund, the judgment creditor has and is limited to the same rights in a mandamus case that he would have had if no judgment had been obtained.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Dupont-Ball, Inc. v. Livingston

Opinion

June, 1916.


Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to the defendant to plead over within twenty days, upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal. All concurred.


Summaries of

Piper v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

In Ward v. Piper, 69 Kan. 773, 77 S.W. 699, it was held that where a judgment has been obtained on bonds or coupons which are payable out of a special fund that in seeking to enforce the judgment out of the special fund, the judgment creditor has and is limited to the same rights in a mandamus case that he would have had if no judgment had been obtained.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Dupont-Ball, Inc. v. Livingston
Case details for

Piper v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS C. PIPER, as Temporary Receiver of L.C. PIPER ICE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1916

Citations

174 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Citing Cases

Town of Columbus v. Barringer

ate Board of Administration, 115 Fla. 806, 156 So. 130; (only asked pro rata share in this case); Sholtz v.…

Teoc Sub-Drainage Dist. v. Halliwell

The making and levying of the assessment may be enforced by mandamus at the instance of any person…