From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinyan v. Hamby

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 11, 1985
336 S.E.2d 331 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

71127.

DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 1985.

Contempt. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge White.

William P. Holley, Jr., for appellant.

David S. Marotte, for appellee.


On October 23, 1980, the appellant, Larry Pinyan, and the appellee, Sara Hamby (formerly Sara Pinyan) were divorced in Cobb County, Georgia, at which time the appellee was awarded custody of their minor child. That divorce decree began what appears to be a protracted domestic legal war.

On February 14, 1983, the appellant filed a contempt action based on the appellee's failure to allow visitation rights, and on December 6, 1983, the Cobb County superior court did find the appellee in contempt. The appellant filed another contempt action soon afterwards on December 22, 1983, alleging the same basis for contempt. Sometime in December 1983, the appellee and the minor child retreated to North Carolina.

On July 26, 1984, the appellee filed her own contempt action against the appellant in the Cobb County superior court, and also an action seeking a modification of visitation rights. In answering, the appellant asserted a counterclaim seeking a change of custody. The two contempt actions were consolidated, and on September 14, 1984, the superior court entered an order finding both parties in contempt. On October 1, 1984, the appellee moved to dismiss the appellant's counterclaim in the visitation rights case, on the basis that the Cobb County court lacked jurisdiction to determine the child custody matter. On April 12, 1985, the superior court granted that motion, and this direct appeal followed. Held:

In this case, the trial court's order dismissing the appellant's counterclaim is not a final judgment, because the main action is still pending with the trial court, and it does not appear that the trial court considered matters outside the pleadings to convert the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment. Because no certificate of immediate review has been obtained, this appeal is premature and must be dismissed. OCGA § 5-6-34, generally; Register v. Kandlbinder, 132 Ga. App. 435 ( 208 S.E.2d 565) (1974); Huff v. Rogers, 129 Ga. App. 897 ( 202 S.E.2d 243) (1973).

Appeal dismissed. Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 1985.


Summaries of

Pinyan v. Hamby

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 11, 1985
336 S.E.2d 331 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Pinyan v. Hamby

Case Details

Full title:PINYAN v. HAMBY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 11, 1985

Citations

336 S.E.2d 331 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
336 S.E.2d 331

Citing Cases

Motorcycle Stuff, Inc. v. Bryant

Accordingly, the counterclaim remains pending in the trial court. The appeal is premature and must be…