From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinnacle Foods v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Delaware
Apr 20, 2010
992 A.2d 1237 (Del. 2010)

Opinion

No. 201, 2010.

April 20, 2010.

Appeal from the Superior (Sussex) CA S09A-07-002.


This 20th day of April 2010, it appears to the Court that:

(1) Employer/appellee below, Pinnacle Foods, has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to appeal from the Superior Court's order of March 22, 2010 that (i) reversed the Industrial Accident Board's denial of the employee/appellant below's petition to determine compensation due and (ii) remanded the matter to the Board for a hearing on the merits of the petition. By order dated April 12, 2010, the Superior Court denied Pinnacle Food's application for certification of the interlocutory appeal.

(2) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional circumstances. We have examined the Superior Court's March 22, 2010 order according to the criteria set forth in Rule 42 and have concluded that exceptional circumstances as would merit review of the order do not exist in this case.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.


Summaries of

Pinnacle Foods v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Delaware
Apr 20, 2010
992 A.2d 1237 (Del. 2010)
Case details for

Pinnacle Foods v. Chandler

Case Details

Full title:Pinnacle Foods v. Chandler

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

Citations

992 A.2d 1237 (Del. 2010)

Citing Cases

Pinnacle Foods v. Chandler

The Superior Court affirmed the IAB's award, from which Pinnacle now appeals. Pinnacle Foods v. Chandler, 992…

Pinnacle Foods v. Chandler

The Superior Court affirmed the IAB's award, from which Pinnacle now appeals. Pinnacle Foods v. Chandler, 992…