From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinna v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1979
67 A.D.2d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

February 20, 1979


In an action to enforce a North Carolina judgment awarding plaintiff damages for breach of contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 1, 1978, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted and complaint dismissed. The North Carolina judgment is void because defendant's contacts with North Carolina were not sufficient to subject him to in personam jurisdiction in that State (see International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316). Defendant, a citizen and resident of New York, placed an advertisement in the December 1, 1975 issue of Shotgun News, offering his 1902 Luger Carbine for sale. Plaintiff, a citizen and resident of North Carolina, responding to that advertisement, telephoned New York and agreed to purchase the gun from defendant. Plaintiff sent a check to defendant in New York for $3,510 to cover the purchase price plus shipping costs, and defendant mailed the gun to North Carolina. After examining the gun in North Carolina, plaintiff claimed it was defective and commenced an action for breach of contract in Wake County, North Carolina. A default judgment was subsequently entered in the District Court Division of the General Court of Justice, Wake County, North Carolina. Defendant's contacts with North Carolina, consisting of the sale and shipment of a single item of merchandise to plaintiff in North Carolina, were so insubstantial that maintenance of the suit in that State did not comport with the requirements of due process (see Erlanger Mills v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, 239 F.2d 502; Golden Belt Mfg. Co. v. Janler Plastic Mold Corp., 281 F. Supp. 368, affd 391 F.2d 266; McKee Elec. Co. v Rauland-Borg Corp., 20 N.Y.2d 377, 381-382; cf. Hardy v. Pioneer Parachute Co., 531 F.2d 193). Damiani, J.P., Titone, Shapiro and Margett, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pinna v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1979
67 A.D.2d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Pinna v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM P. PINNA, Respondent, v. STEVE DAVIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1979

Citations

67 A.D.2d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Independence Bank v. Freed

It has consistently been held thereafter that some minimum contact, some notion of consent and intent and…