From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinkston v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Aug 15, 2012
No. CIV-11-246-FHS-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 15, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV-11-246-FHS-KEW

08-15-2012

JOSEPH P. PINKSTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

On July 24, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge for this District filed Findings and Recommendations in this case. No objection was filed so the Findings are deemed confessed.

The Findings and Recommendations suggest that the case be REVERSED. This Court finds the Findings of the Magistrate Judge applied the proper standards and documents numerous references to the record which support the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the Secretary's decision be REVERSED and that Defendant be ordered to restore Claimant's benefits, and that Claimant be awarded an amount equal to the benefits that would have been paid for the date of termination.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the issues herein, this Court finds and orders that the Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge be SUSTAINED and adopted by this Court as this Court's Findings and Order. Accordingly, this case is REVERSED with orders to the Defendant to restore Claimant's benefits, and that Claimant be awarded an amount equal to the benefits that would have been paid for the date of termination.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of August, 2012.

_________________

Frank H. Seay

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pinkston v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Aug 15, 2012
No. CIV-11-246-FHS-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Pinkston v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH P. PINKSTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Aug 15, 2012

Citations

No. CIV-11-246-FHS-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 15, 2012)

Citing Cases

Delacotera v. Colvin

Other courts presented with this exact language found this procedural mistake was not harmless and required…