From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinkham v. Wemple

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1859
12 Cal. 449 (Cal. 1859)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Tenth District, County of Yuba.

         COUNSEL:

         Henry K. Mitchell, for Appellant.

          Rowe & Mott, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Terry, C. J., concurring.

         OPINION

          BALDWIN, Judge

         The various questions made by the record have either been repeatedly settled by this Court, or are decided by reference to plain elementary principles. There is no single point taken, which, in our judgment, justifies this appeal, and it would be a waste of time to notice the points in detail.

         The judgment is affirmed, with five per cent. damages.


Summaries of

Pinkham v. Wemple

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1859
12 Cal. 449 (Cal. 1859)
Case details for

Pinkham v. Wemple

Case Details

Full title:PINKHAM v. WEMPLE

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1859

Citations

12 Cal. 449 (Cal. 1859)

Citing Cases

Vickter v. Pan Pacific Sales Corp.

The present appeal is one of them. If modern practice permitted, a considerable number would be disposed of…

Ricketson v. Torres

It may be, thatit is only for delay--only to gain a compromise--only to vex, harrass, perhaps from malicious…