From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pineau v. Home Depot, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 14, 1998
245 Conn. 422 (Conn. 1998)

Opinion

(SC 15768)

Argued March 26, 1998

Officially released July 14, 1998

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendant, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven and tried to the jury before Hon. Donald W. Celotto, judge trial referee; verdict for the defendant; thereafter, the court, exercising the powers of the Superior Court, rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict, from which the plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Court, Dupont, C.J., and Lavery and Downey, Js., which affirmed the trial court's judgment, and the plaintiff, on the granting of certification, appealed to this court. Appeal dismissed.

Max F. Brunswick, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Frederick J. Trotta, Sr., with whom was Cynthia K. Sammarco, for the appellee (defendant).


OPINION


After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification limited to the following issue: "Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to a jury instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?" Pineau v. Home Depot, Inc., 243 Conn. 902, 701 A.2d 332 (1997).


Summaries of

Pineau v. Home Depot, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 14, 1998
245 Conn. 422 (Conn. 1998)
Case details for

Pineau v. Home Depot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PINEAU v. HOME DEPOT, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 14, 1998

Citations

245 Conn. 422 (Conn. 1998)
713 A.2d 825

Citing Cases

Sutera v. Natiello

(Citations omitted; emphasis added; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Pineau v. Home…

State v. Maskiell

The doctrine has been applied in appeals in which an appellant has challenged on appeal the admissibility of…