From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pilato v. Kapur

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 18, 1990
580 A.2d 59 (Conn. 1990)

Opinion

Decided September 18, 1990


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 282, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. In a case referred to an attorney trial referee, is the decision whether to award interest as an element of damages within the province of the attorney trial referee or the trial court?

"2. Should the Appellate Court have remanded the case with direction that the determination of whether interest should be allowed be made by the attorney trial referee who had heard the case and had refused to award interest upon a ground later determined to be erroneous?

"3. Should the Appellate Court have complied with General Statutes 51-183c in remanding the case?"

Melvin J. Silverman, in support of the petition.

Anthony E. Ahern, in opposition.


Summaries of

Pilato v. Kapur

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 18, 1990
580 A.2d 59 (Conn. 1990)
Case details for

Pilato v. Kapur

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PILATO v. JATINDER N. KAPUR ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 18, 1990

Citations

580 A.2d 59 (Conn. 1990)
216 Conn. 813