Opinion
October 7, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Feeman, Jr., J.
Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendants' motion for summary judgment was properly denied. The record presents triable issues of fact on the question whether plaintiff Paula Pikulski suffered a serious injury within the meaning of the No-Fault Law (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). The conflicting opinions of the medical experts raise issues of credibility, which are for the jury to determine (see, Weider v Senebouthyrath, 182 A.D.2d 1124; Francis v Basic Metal, 144 A.D.2d 634, 635).