From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierson v. Berghuis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2013
Case No. 1:10cv455 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10cv455

08-12-2013

JAMES PIERSON, Petitioner, v. MARY BERGHUIS, Respondent.


Hon. Robert J. Jonker


ORDER

APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties on July 9, 2013. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed July 9, 2013, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's habeas petition is DENIED. Rule 8, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.

____________________________

ROBERT J. JONKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pierson v. Berghuis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2013
Case No. 1:10cv455 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Pierson v. Berghuis

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PIERSON, Petitioner, v. MARY BERGHUIS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:10cv455 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 12, 2013)

Citing Cases

Morris v. Howard

See United States v. Slatten, 865 F.3d 767, 80506 (D.C. Cir. 2017); see also United States v. Henley, 766…