From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Sanders

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Aug 24, 2015
No. 72542-4-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2015)

Opinion

72542-4-I

08-24-2015

KARL PIERCE, Appellant, v. DR. BENJAMIN SANDERS and DR. JENNIFER DOE, Respondents.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM

Karl Pierce attempted to file this action for damages in King County Superior Court and moved for a waiver of the filing fee. The trial court found Pierce indigent, but refused to waive the filing fee on the grounds that 'the Non-Claim statute [was] not followed." We granted Pierce's motion for discretionary review and now reverse.

The King County Prosecutor's Office appeared on behalf of respondent Dr. Benjamin Sanders, but did not file any objections or pleadings.

In Jafar v. Webb, 177 Wn.2d 520, 532, 303 P.3d 1042 (2013), our Supreme Court held that once the trial court determines that a civil litigant is indigent under GR 34, it must waive all filing fees and surcharges:

We hold GR 34 provides a uniform standard for determining whether an individual is indigent and further requires the court to waive all fees and costs for individuals who meet this standard. The rule was adopted to ensure that indigent litigants have equal access to justice. Any fees required of indigent litigants are invalid and must be waived under the rule.
See also Sobota v. Mahlik, __Wn. App.__, 348 P.3d 1222 (2015).

Here, the trial court found Pierce was indigent under GR 34(a)(3)(B) ("his or her household income is at or below 125 percent of the federal poverty guideline"). Consequently, the court erred in denying Pierce's request for a filing fee waiver.

We reverse the trial court's order and remand with instructions to grant a waiver only of filing fees and surcharges in accordance with Gr 34 and Jafar.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Pierce v. Sanders

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Aug 24, 2015
No. 72542-4-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Pierce v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:KARL PIERCE, Appellant, v. DR. BENJAMIN SANDERS and DR. JENNIFER DOE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Aug 24, 2015

Citations

No. 72542-4-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. S.S.D. Co.

The rule in such cases seems to be that when a bailee is sued by the owner for the conversion or negligent…

Produce Co. v. Railroad Companies

[Ess v. Griffith, 128 Mo. 50, 62; Mohr v. Langan, 162 Mo. 474.] It is likewise undoubtedly true that where…