Pierce v. Pierce

Full title: GEORGE STANFORD PIERCE, JR., Appellant, v. AMY PIERCE, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 8, 2019

264 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2D18-319

02-08-2019

George Stanford PIERCE, Jr., Appellant, v. Amy PIERCE, Appellee.

Jane H. Grossman, St. Petersburg, for Appellant. Peyton Mullin and Alexa Saab of Meros, Smith, Lazzara, Brennan & Brennan, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jane H. Grossman, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Peyton Mullin and Alexa Saab of Meros, Smith, Lazzara, Brennan & Brennan, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sun Harbor Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bonura, 95 So.3d 262, 265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (recognizing that pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(a), the circuit court has concurrent jurisdiction with the appellate court during the pendency of review before the record is docketed to render orders on procedural matters relating to the case).

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.