From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce Cnty. v. Ladner

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Dec 29, 2015
366 Wis. 2d 808 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

In Malzewski and Pierce County v. Ladner, No. 2015-AP-119, 2015 WL 9464652 (Wis. Ct. App. Dec. 29, 2015) (unpublished)—the cases on which Theoharis relies—the Wisconsin Court of Appeals rejected fraud claims on reasonability grounds when the plaintiffs declined to inspect their subject purchases despite knowledge of potential defects.

Summary of this case from Hepper v. Theoharis

Opinion

No. 2015AP119.

12-29-2015

PIERCE COUNTY, Plaintiff, v. James LADNER, Defendant–Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant–Cross–Respondent, v. Paul Mosby, Third–Party Defendant–Respondent–Cross–Appellant.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Pierce Cnty. v. Ladner

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Dec 29, 2015
366 Wis. 2d 808 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)

In Malzewski and Pierce County v. Ladner, No. 2015-AP-119, 2015 WL 9464652 (Wis. Ct. App. Dec. 29, 2015) (unpublished)—the cases on which Theoharis relies—the Wisconsin Court of Appeals rejected fraud claims on reasonability grounds when the plaintiffs declined to inspect their subject purchases despite knowledge of potential defects.

Summary of this case from Hepper v. Theoharis
Case details for

Pierce Cnty. v. Ladner

Case Details

Full title:PIERCE COUNTY, Plaintiff, v. James LADNER, Defendant–Third–Party…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Dec 29, 2015

Citations

366 Wis. 2d 808 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)
874 N.W.2d 347

Citing Cases

Hepper v. Theoharis

While Hepper's testimony overstates the deductive potential of the Corvette documents, the Court cannot hold…