From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickett v. Tequesta Development Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 29, 1994
639 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2962.

July 29, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County; Robert B. McGregor, Judge.

T. Kevin Knight of Drage, de Beaubien, Knight, Simmons, Romano Neal, Orlando, for appellants.

Jerry R. Linscott, Brenda H. Smith and Robert W. Thielhelm, Jr., of Baker Hostetler, Orlando, for appellees.


Appellants, plaintiffs below, appeal the award of costs and attorney's fees to appellees, defendants below. We reverse. The appellants' cause of action accrued prior to the October 1, 1990 effective date of amendment to section 768.79, Florida Statutes. The pre-amendment version of that statute, providing for award of attorney's fees and costs against the plaintiff only where the plaintiff obtains a judgment against the defendants, applies to appellants. Buchanan v. Allstate Ins. Co., 629 So.2d 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Under the prior version of the statute a defendant may not obtain an award of fees if the judgment is of no liability. In the instant case, since a judgment of no liability was entered against appellants, and since the prior version of the statute applies, the award of fees and costs was improper.

We reverse the December 3, 1993 judgment assessing defendants' costs and attorney's fees against appellants.

REVERSED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pickett v. Tequesta Development Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 29, 1994
639 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Pickett v. Tequesta Development Co.

Case Details

Full title:W. JAMES PICKETT, III, M.D., P.A.; AND W. JAMES PICKETT, III, M.D.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 29, 1994

Citations

639 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Marcus v. Miller

By reversing at bar, we align ourselves with the other district courts of appeal that have recognized that…