In Pickerell v. Schumacher, 215 App. Div. 745, 212 N.Y.S. 899, affirmed 242 N.Y. 577, 152 N.E. 434, it appeared that the claimant was driving a hearse up a grade.
Summary of this case from Hoage v. Royal Indemnity Co.November, 1925.
Award modified by striking out the sum of $343, awarded to claimant with lien thereon to Dr. Crimmins in that sum, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In Pickerell v. Schumacher, 215 App. Div. 745, 212 N.Y.S. 899, affirmed 242 N.Y. 577, 152 N.E. 434, it appeared that the claimant was driving a hearse up a grade.
Summary of this case from Hoage v. Royal Indemnity Co.Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. CHARLES PICKERELL, Respondent…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1925
The facts in that case which differ from this are: (1) That there was no physical exertion, the deceased was…
Rathburn v. Taber Tank Lines, Inc.The court adopted the holding in Thompson v. City of Binghamton, 218 App. Div. 451, 218 N.Y.S. 355, to the…