From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickard v. Kelley

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1877
52 Cal. 89 (Cal. 1877)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court, County of Lassen.

         Action of forcible entry and detainer to recover possession of the north half of the southeast one-quarter of section nine, and the north one-half of the southwest one-quarter of section ten, township twenty-nine north, and range thirteen east, Mount Diablo meridian. On the trial, the plaintiff, to prove possession in himself, offered in evidence a certificate of pre-emption of the land issued to him by the Register of the United States Land Office at Susanville, on the 1st day of November, 1875. The defendant objected to its reception for that purpose, but the Court overruled the objection, and he excepted. The plaintiff recovered judgment, and the defendant appealed from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

         COUNSEL:

         To maintain an action of forcible entry there must be an actual and peaceable possession in the plaintiff. (Vall v. But ler , 49 Cal. 75; sec. 1172, Code Civil Procedure.)

         The certificate of pre-emption would not even give a right of possession, and certainly would not prove the factof possession.

         A deed is not admissible in evidence to show possession, or to show a right of possession. (Sanchez v. Louregro , 46 Cal. 641.)

         E. V. Spencer, for the Appellant.

         J. W. Hendrick, for the Respondent.


         OPINION          The Court:

         The " certificate of pre-emption" did not tend to show actual possession in the plaintiff, and the Court below erred in admitting it in evidence.

         Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Pickard v. Kelley

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1877
52 Cal. 89 (Cal. 1877)
Case details for

Pickard v. Kelley

Case Details

Full title:JOHN W. PICKARD v. GEORGE F. KELLEY

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1877

Citations

52 Cal. 89 (Cal. 1877)

Citing Cases

Whittaker v. Pendola

The homestead receipt does not show actual possession of any part of the lands. (Pickard v. Kelley , 52 Cal. …

Goodwin v. McCabe

(See McDonald v. Edmonds , 44 Cal. 330.) The cases of Pulliam v. C. F. B. G. Co ., 52 Cal. 605, and Picard…