From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phoenixville Hospital v. W.C.A.B. (Shoap)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District
Apr 27, 2011
18 A.3d 1093 (Pa. 2011)

Opinion

No. 517 EAL 2010.

April 27, 2011.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27th day of April 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

a. Did the Commonwealth Court err and misinterpret the meaning of § 306(b)(2) of the Workers' Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 512(2)[,] in determining that a job is available to a claimant for purposes of said Act even when a claimant applies to each individual job contained in a labor market survey and does not receive an offer of employment?

b. Did the Commonwealth Court err in failing to remand the matter to the Workers' Compensation Judge for a determination of whether or not the jobs identified by the employer's vocational expert were open and available in light of the fact that the holding of the Commonwealth Court in the within matter altered the status of the law at the time of the decision rendered by the Workers' Compensation Judge?


Summaries of

Phoenixville Hospital v. W.C.A.B. (Shoap)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District
Apr 27, 2011
18 A.3d 1093 (Pa. 2011)
Case details for

Phoenixville Hospital v. W.C.A.B. (Shoap)

Case Details

Full title:PHOENIXVILLE HOSPITAL v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SHOAP…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District

Date published: Apr 27, 2011

Citations

18 A.3d 1093 (Pa. 2011)

Citing Cases

Phoenixville Hosp. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd. (In re Shoap)

(b) Did the Commonwealth Court err in failing to remand the matter to the Workers' Compensation Judge for a…

Phoenixville Hosp. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

(b) Did the Commonwealth Court err in failing to remand the matter to the Workers' Compensation Judge for a…