From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 20, 2022
352 So. 3d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2431.

12-20-2022

Glen Dillon PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jessica J. Yeary , Public Defender, and Kathryn Lane , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Jessica J. Yeary , Public Defender, and Kathryn Lane , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm this appeal in all respects, except that the trial court's imposition of the $50 cost of investigation is unlawful under section 938.27, Fla. Stat. (2019) because no agency requested them. See Hawkins v. State, 198 So.3d 1159, 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Ogden v. State, 117 So.3d 479, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Appellant's motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) challenging the imposition of these costs should have been granted. Id.

Appellant's judgment and sentence are thus AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for entry of a corrected judgment and sentence striking the $50 investigatory costs.

Lewis, Makar, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Phillips v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 20, 2022
352 So. 3d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Phillips v. State

Case Details

Full title:Glen Dillon PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

352 So. 3d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Citing Cases

Beauford v. State

We reverse, however, the imposition of investigative costs as those costs were never requested by the State…