From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Francis

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 26, 2009
332 F. App'x 103 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-6596.

Submitted: August 20, 2009.

Decided: August 26, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00159-FPS-JES).

Derek Phillips, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Derek Phillips, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Phillips v. Francis, No. 5:06-cv-00159-FPS-JES, 2009 WL 779040 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Phillips v. Francis

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 26, 2009
332 F. App'x 103 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Phillips v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:Derek PHILLIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joyce FRANCIS, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 26, 2009

Citations

332 F. App'x 103 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Winkelman v. Oddo

Section 2255 is not rendered inadequate or ineffective because of "a limitation bar, the prohibition against…

Suggs v. Purdue

Furthermore, § 2255 is not rendered inadequate or ineffective because of "a limitation bar, the prohibition…