From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. East Paterson

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 17, 1947
50 A.2d 869 (N.J. 1947)

Opinion

Argued October 16, 1946 —

Decided January 17, 1947.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 134 N.J.L. 161.

For the appellants, R. Sery Nicosia and Dominick F. Pachella.

For the respondents, Winne Banta and John A. Christie.


The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, DONGES, HEHER, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, JJ. 11.

For reversal — PERSKIE, COLIE, McGEEHAN, JJ. 3.


Summaries of

Phillips v. East Paterson

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 17, 1947
50 A.2d 869 (N.J. 1947)
Case details for

Phillips v. East Paterson

Case Details

Full title:G. WILLARD PHILLIPS ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF EAST PATERSON ET…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 17, 1947

Citations

50 A.2d 869 (N.J. 1947)
50 A.2d 869

Citing Cases

Bd., Com'rs, Ridgefield Pk. v. A.S. Pater Realty

" See, in general, Antonelli Construction v. Milstead, 34 N.J. Super. 449, 457-58 ( Law Div. 1955); Potts…

Antonelli Construction v. Milstead

An ordinance is invalid where it vests broad discretion in the mayor and council in granting or refusing a…