Opinion
21-020
02-11-2021
Per Curiam.
Order (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), entered November 20, 2020, affirmed, without costs.
Defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment, which was ostensibly unopposed by plaintiff, was properly denied on the ground that defendant failed to submit proof of service of the motion papers ( see MTGLQ Invs., L.P. v White , 179 AD3d 790, 791 [2020] ; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Whitelock , 154 AD3d 906 [2017] ; Lenders Capital LLC v Ranu Realty Corp., 99 AD3d 566 [2012] ). In light of our determination, we need not reach defendant's remaining contentions.
All concur.