From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phelps v. Oakland Riders

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 25, 2024
24-cv-00571-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-00571-JD

03-25-2024

BRIGGETT C PHELPS, Plaintiff, v. OAKLAND RIDERS, et al., Defendants.


SECOND ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO, United mates District Judge.

The Court directed pro se plaintiff Briggett Phelps to file an amended complaint by March 1, 2024, and advised that “[f]ailure to amend by the deadline will result in dismissal and entry of judgment against Phelps under Rule 41(b).” Dkt. No. 10 at 2. More than three weeks have passed since that deadline, and Phelps has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court. Consequently, the case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Phelps v. Oakland Riders

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 25, 2024
24-cv-00571-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Phelps v. Oakland Riders

Case Details

Full title:BRIGGETT C PHELPS, Plaintiff, v. OAKLAND RIDERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 25, 2024

Citations

24-cv-00571-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2024)