From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phaneuf v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 8, 1990
557 So. 2d 685 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-66.

March 8, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County; John W. Watson, III, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a guideline departure sentence. The reasons given for departure were based on probation violations and are invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1989); Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989). Accordingly, the defendant's sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.

Sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentencing.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Phaneuf v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 8, 1990
557 So. 2d 685 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Phaneuf v. State

Case Details

Full title:WALLACE EDWARD PHANEUF, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 8, 1990

Citations

557 So. 2d 685 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Ramsey v. State

The other reasons given are based on the defendant's violation of probation and were used as a basis for a…

Lipscomb v. State

Upon revocation of probation, the trial court is limited to the original guidelines sentence and the one cell…