From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pfister v. Madison Beach Hotel, LLC

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 23, 2020
335 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2020)

Opinion

06-23-2020

Cecilia PFISTER et al. v. MADISON BEACH HOTEL, LLC, et al.

Karen L. Dowd and Scott T. Garosshen, Hartford, in support of the petition. Damian K. Gunningsmith, David S. Hardy and Drew J. Cunningham, New Haven, in opposition.


Karen L. Dowd and Scott T. Garosshen, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Damian K. Gunningsmith, David S. Hardy and Drew J. Cunningham, New Haven, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 197 Conn. App. 326, 232 A.3d 52 (2020), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly apply plenary review to the trial court's judgment?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly apply the ‘actual use' doctrine in relation to the nonconforming use at issue in this case?

"3. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that a zoning regulation that limits use of a park to ‘recreational purposes' allowed the concerts at issue in this case to occur?''

ECKER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Pfister v. Madison Beach Hotel, LLC

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 23, 2020
335 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2020)
Case details for

Pfister v. Madison Beach Hotel, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Cecilia PFISTER et al. v. MADISON BEACH HOTEL, LLC, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 23, 2020

Citations

335 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2020)
335 Conn. 923

Citing Cases

Pfister v. Madison Beach Hotel, LLC

And (3) "[d]id the Appellate Court correctly conclude that a zoning regulation that limits use of a park to…