From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pfeifer v. Liss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 17, 2000
275 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

August 17, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on or about January 14, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants' motion, pursuant to CPLR 510(3), for a change of venue to Bronx County, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and defendant's motion denied.

Pro Se, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jay Goldberg Debra A. Karlstein, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Williams, J.P., Tom, Wallach, Andrias, JJ.


Absent any claim that the venue chosen by plaintiff is improper and, in light of the conclusory allegations of inconvenience to both prospective lay and attorney witnesses, it was improvident to order a change of the venue chosen by plaintiff solely on the grounds that both parties are Bronx residents and that the Justice who presided over the settlement of the underlying Bronx action was prepared to hold a speedy fee hearing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Pfeifer v. Liss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 17, 2000
275 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Pfeifer v. Liss

Case Details

Full title:MAXWELL S. PFEIFER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NORMAN LISS, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 17, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 888

Citing Cases

Liapakis v. Sullivan

This language, which was handwritten, replaced stricken typewritten language that explicitly gave the Nassau…

Ambroise v. United Parcel Serv. of Am., Inc.

Here, the defendants failed to set forth any of the facts to which the prospective witnesses would testify at…