From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peyser v. Searle

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 30, 2002
99 Civ. 10785 (WK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2002)

Opinion

99 Civ. 10785 (WK)

September 30, 2002

Stephen Peyser, Diane Moss, One By Diana, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs (pro se).

Robert P. Lynn, Jr., John W. Dunne, Law Office of Robert P. Lynn, Jr., LLC, Mineola, NY, For Defendants Carol Horn, E.N.K. Productions Ltd., and former Defendants Searle Blatt Co., Ltd., Steve Searle, and Alice Blatt Searle, Joel K. Bohmart, Bohmart Sacks, P.C., New York, NY, For Defendants Roni Rabl, Inc. and Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc.


ORDER


On August 1, 2002, we granted the Plaintiffs' previous request for an extension of time in which to file a "response" to our July 23, 2002 order and indicated that no further extensions of time for such a "response" would be granted. Nonetheless, on September 3, 2002, for good cause shown under the circumstances, we also granted the Plaintiffs a second extension of time to file their "response." For reasons relating directly to their previous request for an extension, the Plaintiffs now request a third extension of time in which to file a "response" to our July 23, 2002 order. Under the circumstances, we again GRANT the Plaintiffs' request. The Plaintiffs may file the foregoing "response" on or before November 7, 2002. Again, the Plaintiffs should bear in mind that, unless they can demonstrate good cause, no further extensions of time will be granted.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peyser v. Searle

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 30, 2002
99 Civ. 10785 (WK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2002)
Case details for

Peyser v. Searle

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN PEYSER d/b/a ONE BY DIANA, DIANE MOSS, Plaintiffs, v. SEARLE BLATT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 30, 2002

Citations

99 Civ. 10785 (WK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2002)