holding that the losing party at summary judgment may not belatedly submit additional evidence so as to create a genuine issue of material fact after the fact
Summary of this case from Chevalier Adver., Inc. v. Ballista Tactical Sys., Inc.February 15, 2000
holding that the losing party at summary judgment may not belatedly submit additional evidence so as to create a genuine issue of material fact after the fact
Summary of this case from Chevalier Adver., Inc. v. Ballista Tactical Sys., Inc.describing the gross negligence inquiry in the context of a rescission claim
Summary of this case from Pioneer Res. v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.setting out analysis
Summary of this case from Zygar v. JohnsonFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Feb 15, 2000
Finally, if the meaning of a disputed contractual provision remains unclear after those first two steps, we…
State v. NguyenAccordingly, although the trial court apparently did not intend to suppress this evidence, technically the…