holding that a respondent's assignment of error that would yield relief different from that awarded by trial court judgment was not properly before appellate court unless raised by cross-appeal
Summary of this case from Capital Credit Coll. v. ArmaniMay 28, 2003
holding that a respondent's assignment of error that would yield relief different from that awarded by trial court judgment was not properly before appellate court unless raised by cross-appeal
Summary of this case from Capital Credit Coll. v. Armaniholding that a respondent's assignment of error that would yield relief different from that awarded by trial court judgment was not properly before appellate court unless raised by cross-appeal
Summary of this case from Batzer Construction, Inc. v. Boyerdismissing appeal because "defendant has deliberately and repeatedly flouted the trial court's contempt judgments by failing to surrender to authorities to serve his jail sentence"
Summary of this case from State v. RobbinsFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: May 28, 2003
Those are not the circumstances of this case. Beyond the authority granted to us by our own rule, there…
State v. FordOrtega-Rodriguez v. United States, 507 US 234, 242, 113 S Ct 1199, 122 L Ed 2d 581 (1993) (noting that the…