Summary
holding that the dominant tenant is entitled to use the land in any way he or she wants as long as the use does not unreasonably interfere with ingress or egress
Summary of this case from Clark v. KuhnOpinion
1992.
holding that the dominant tenant is entitled to use the land in any way he or she wants as long as the use does not unreasonably interfere with ingress or egress
Summary of this case from Clark v. Kuhn1992.
holding that the dominant tenant is entitled to use the land in any way he or she wants as long as the use does not unreasonably interfere with ingress or egress
Summary of this case from Clark v. KuhnFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
State ex rel Juvenile Department of Lane County et al v. Roth, nka Norris (A71516) In the Matter of Wolin,…
Tipperman v. TsiatsosRelocation of a specified easement may be made by mutual consent, which may be implied. Ericsson v. Braukman,…