From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 23, 1990
310 Or. 476 (Or. 1990)

Summary

affirming the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment for excusable neglect, where the party's trial counsel claimed not to have received the trial notice, but it was mailed to the correct address and was not returned as undelivered

Summary of this case from Guest v. Mannenbach

Opinion


799 P.2d 150 (Or. 1990) 310 Or. 476 DOE v. PORTLAND HEALTH CENTERS, INC. A50231 S36755. Supreme Court of Oregon. October 23, 1990

       Prior report: 99 Or.App. 423, 782 P.2d 446.

       Motion to dismiss petition for review filed by petitioner on review and respondents on review is allowed. Petition for review dismissed. Petition for review was previously allowed February 22, 1990, 309 Or. 333, 787 P.2d 887.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 23, 1990
310 Or. 476 (Or. 1990)

affirming the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment for excusable neglect, where the party's trial counsel claimed not to have received the trial notice, but it was mailed to the correct address and was not returned as undelivered

Summary of this case from Guest v. Mannenbach
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 23, 1990

Citations

310 Or. 476 (Or. 1990)
310 Or. 476

Citing Cases

Zavalas v. Dept. of Corrections

Defendant offers no basis for holding that, under the particular circumstances of this case, he should…

Weaver and Weaver

We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in deciding that wife was not entitled to…