Summary
referring to ORS 41.740, the general parol evidence rule
Summary of this case from Teague Motor Company v. RowtonOpinion
February 17, 1982.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 17, 1982
292 Or. 581 (Or. 1982)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 17, 1982
292 Or. 581 (Or. 1982)
referring to ORS 41.740, the general parol evidence rule
Summary of this case from Teague Motor Company v. RowtonCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Feb 17, 1982
Citations
292 Or. 581 (Or. 1982)
Citing Cases
Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.
The second line holds that damages are not ascertainable where there are conflicting claims regarding the…
Youth Care Services v. Employment DivisionWe hold that the referee was correct. Independently of the requirements of the administrative rule, our…