Summary
treating the statutory and constitutional particularity requirements as coextensive
Summary of this case from State v. KauppiOpinion
1997.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1997
326 Or. 234 (Or. 1997)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1997
326 Or. 234 (Or. 1997)
treating the statutory and constitutional particularity requirements as coextensive
Summary of this case from State v. Kauppitreating the statutory and constitutional particularity requirements as coextensive
Summary of this case from State v. Carterdescribing frisk process
Summary of this case from State v. Miearstreating factors as discrete and separate would dissolve the totality of the circumstances and ignore the continuing possibility of danger
Summary of this case from State v. PremsinghCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Citations
326 Or. 234 (Or. 1997)
Citing Cases
State v. Rudder
Id. at 347. In contrast to our holding in Weems, we held in State v. Rickard, 150 Or App 517, 526, 947 P2d…
State v. ZumbrumOur inquiry into "reasonableness" requires consideration of the nature and extent of the perceived danger and…