denying motion to dismiss under ORCP 9A on ground that an insurer's attorney was not served with the petition for judicial review: ORS 656.298 "requires that a notice of appeal be sent to all parties, [but] does not require that it be sent to all attorneys representing the parties"
Summary of this case from Haskell Corp. v. FilippiSeptember 27, 1983.
denying motion to dismiss under ORCP 9A on ground that an insurer's attorney was not served with the petition for judicial review: ORS 656.298 "requires that a notice of appeal be sent to all parties, [but] does not require that it be sent to all attorneys representing the parties"
Summary of this case from Haskell Corp. v. FilippiFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Sep 27, 1983
A conditional privilege to make a defamatory statement can arise when it is made to protect the interests of…
Warner v. SaifArgued and submitted March 2, 1983Affirmed May 25, 1983 Reconsideration denied August 19, petition for review…