holding that the Oregon racketeering statute, based on the federal racketeering statute, was intended to allow for separate convictions and consecutive sentences for the racketeering offense and its predicate crimes
Summary of this case from State v. Ortega-GonsalezJanuary 12, 1988.
holding that the Oregon racketeering statute, based on the federal racketeering statute, was intended to allow for separate convictions and consecutive sentences for the racketeering offense and its predicate crimes
Summary of this case from State v. Ortega-Gonsalezconstruing state racketeering statute patterned after Federal RICO and holding that separate convictions and consecutive sentences are permissible
Summary of this case from State v. BallFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 12, 1988
They argue that merger must occur, because proof of the violation of two subsections of ORS 167.012 involved…
State v. Ortega-Gonsalez"That is so because, with respect to multiple punishments, additional elements demonstrate a legislative…