From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 317 (Or. 1998)

Summary

interpreting analogous language of ORS 465.325, explaining the "finding of liability [under ORS 465.255 ] defined the universe of persons among whom the trial court could allocate responsibility for remediation costs"

Summary of this case from Rudder v. Hosack

Opinion

1998.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 317 (Or. 1998)

interpreting analogous language of ORS 465.325, explaining the "finding of liability [under ORS 465.255 ] defined the universe of persons among whom the trial court could allocate responsibility for remediation costs"

Summary of this case from Rudder v. Hosack

phrasing of statutory language, including verb tense, may indicate legislative intent as to retroactivity

Summary of this case from Vloedman v. Cornell
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1998

Citations

327 Or. 317 (Or. 1998)
966 P.2d 220

Citing Cases

Turner v. Hall

In April 1998, petitioner filed a Petition for Review with the Oregon Supreme Court. That petition was denied…

Newell v. Weston

We allow defendant's petition in the amount of $14,731.28. The facts of the case are set forth in detail in…